Minor changes to README

README.md

@@ -73,11 +73,11 @@ everything works as expected).
   - [input file](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48.in)
   - [analysis](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis)
   - [results](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis/results.txt)
-- Numerical results for t0/a^2 are barely compatible:
-  - $`\langle t0\rangle = 2.7854(62)`$ (arXiv:1006.4518, table 1).
-  - $`\langle t0\rangle = 2.7719(43)`$ 
-	[results](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis/results.txt)
-- The history of the topological charge does not look good.
+  - Numerical results for t0/a^2 are barely compatible:
+	- $`\langle t0\rangle = 2.7854(62)`$ (arXiv:1006.4518, table 1).
+	- $`\langle t0\rangle = 2.7719(43)`$ 
+      [results](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis/results.txt)
+  - The history of the topological charge does not look good.
 
 #### Flow measurements in arXiv:1710.07526 and arXiv:1805.07106
 
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ everything works as expected).
   - [input file](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48.in)
   - [analysis](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis)
   - [results](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis/results.txt)
-- The plaquette agrees perfectly (assuming that the reference missed a
-  factor two in the definition of the plaquette):
-  - $`\langle P\rangle = 0.651967(2)`$ (arXiv:1710.07526, table VII).
-  - $`\langle P\rangle = 0.6519656(57)`$
-    ([results](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis/results.txt))
+  - The plaquette agrees perfectly (assuming that the reference missed a
+	factor two in the definition of the plaquette):
+	- $`\langle P\rangle = 0.651967(2)`$ (arXiv:1710.07526, table VII).
+	- $`\langle P\rangle = 0.6519656(57)`$
+      ([results](./data/SU3_PBC_bt5.96_L24x24x24x48/analysis/results.txt))